Archive for January, 2010

We’re thrilled to announce that this coming Tuesday night, Nextpoint is publicly releasing our new direct to market pricing for our Discovery Cloud and Trial Cloud services. These services will be offered starting at $25/GB per month and now includes free native file processing. We are also rolling out Preservation Cloud pricing at $1/GB per month. You can get all of the details here on our pricing page.

Nextpoint leverages the power of cloud computing to deliver next-generation litigation technology to the entire legal industry — from solo practitioners to the largest multi-national corporation — at a revolutionary price. And we do it by eliminating native file processing fees in total.

Our breakthrough processing costs were already leading the industry, and it’s that kind of value that explains why we’ve doubled our user base over the past year.

In going one step further by simplifying pricing for our Trial and Discovery Cloud services — products that already include free OCR, image stamping, export and download, and a host of review and trial specific functionality — lawyers with matters of every size and scope now have a defensible, stable technology platform from which they can get back to practicing law— not paying for and managing technology.

Our pricing comes from a simple mission, to deliver world-class engineering, design, and customer service to the legal industry. And it’s this service our current customers love, so we invite you to give us a test drive — free, with no risk — and see for yourself how Nextpoint is changing the face of litigation technology.

About Nextpoint:
Nextpoint is a next-generation litigation support company. Our applications flow from our dedication to a simple but essential mission: to deliver world-class software with an uncompromising commitment to engineering, design, and customer service. Trusted by leading corporations and blue-chip law firms, Nextpoint is the better way to organize electronic discovery.

For more information, contact Elyse Fleischman at (773) 929-4000 ext. 120.


Read Full Post »

As interest in cloud computing and our products is increasing, I’m doing a lot of eduction to lawyers on the internet. A joke I keep using to put into context cloud computing is to say, “I think this Internet thing will be big”.

To further make my point about why the internet is important to lawyers and law firms, and why they need an Internet-based strategy is by using an analogy between large corporate law firms and newspapers.

Both have fundamentally the same product – writing
Both law firms and newspapers survive on generating content primarily delivered as the written word. Easy enough. Investigations, fact checking, interviewing, proofreading, copy/contract writing — both industries are about words.

Quality content drives reputation and market share
Both industries are fundamentally driven on the quality of their underlying content. The newspaper in the United States with the highest circulation is the Wall Street Journal, a serious business driven publication.

Both are ruled by tradition-bound institutions
A look at the 10 largest newspapers and law-firms show you with minor exceptions USA Today (1982), DLA (merger in 2005), these are multi-generational institutions where organizational change is difficult.

Both self-regulate according often somewhat nebulous standards
While some are clear cut, often times what constitutes appropriate journalistic ethics or legal ethics is often in the eye of the beholder and subject to vigorous debate.

Geographic strength is critical in a fractured marketplace
Both concentrate geographically, including establishing satellite offices/bureaus to extend reach in a marketplace where even the largest player controls at most single digit market share.

Both have business models that rely on bundling of high-value content with low-value services Newspapers are driven by display and classified advertising combined on a page with original content. Large law firms rely on relevance review, basic legal research, and contract work generally done by junior associates to essentially subsidize the salaries of their senior attorneys, who deliver the highest value content.

Physical scale, once a strength, is now a weakenss
It takes a lot of iron to run a physical newspaper. And tradition has it if you have a “big case” you need a “big law firm”. No longer. Technology has enabled the smartest folks to deliver the same quality content without the physical overhead and with far fewer people. It’s no surprise a substantial portion of our user base is comprised of “boutique litigation” shops.

Neither has been proactive about the Internet
Sort of the punch line here isn’t it? Newspapers have undergone an wrenching restructuring with many going bankrupt because of their inability to adapt to Internet revolution.

The industry can undergo wrenching changes with breathtaking speed
Think the Tribune Company believed in 2000 that they would be bankrupt by 2008? The Sun-Times? The Minneapolis Star Tribune? Did they believe it in 2005?

The legal industry has been largely unaffected by the technology of the internet in its daily operations minus one huge exception. E-mail.

Is that it? E-mail? In the end, will e-mail be the maximum impact of the internet on the legal industry? Or have we just seen the beginning?

Read Full Post »